Essay PreviewMore ↓
We really cannot know for certain. If there was a cover-up to protect the actual murderers, it was done exceedingly well and so thoroughly that we will never be able to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt what really happened. In spite of what I see as very persuasive evidence that Richard did not kill the children, there are many very intelligent, highly successful, and unquestionably reputable historical scholars out there who believe that they have evidence that the king did commit the murders and that this evidence is equally as compelling as anything I believe.
But since you ask, let me give you my reasons. First, Richard did not have a strong enough need to kill the boys or enough of a reason. He seems to have successfully had them declared bastards legally--based on evidence of bigamy against his elder brother (their late father) Edward IV-- before he (Richard) ascended the throne. This action removed the boys from the line of succession to the throne of England. Killing them might thereby rid Richard of two people who later might try to prove their own right to inherit, but killing them also might alienate him from his own supporters as a murderer of his own family. This logic, however, does not save Richard from the charge of having had someone else--most commonly thought to be Buckingham--assassinate them secretly. I still do not feel this is likely, for reasons I will explain as I go. But Richard's successor, the usurper Henry Tudor, had all sorts of good reasons to kill off any Plantagenet heirs to the throne, the main one being that Henry was out to establish his own family--the Tudors--as the reigning dynasty. Henry celebrated his success in taking over the throne by hiring his own historian to write an account of how this all came about, and we are still relying on this account, even though we know that it is pro-Tudor propaganda.
Second, Richard's family is known to have been extremely close in their affections for each other. Richard's older brother, Edward IV, seems to have trusted Richard a great deal; when the younger sibling was a mere teenager, Edward had him commanding armies in the battles over the succession (a.k.a. The Wars of the Roses). When Edward made his will, he left Richard as Regent to protect the two sons--Edward, Prince of Wales and Richard of York--of the dying king and his wife Elizabeth.
How to Cite this Page
"Richard III - Did Richard Kill the Children?." 123HelpMe.com. 15 Jan 2019
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- Richard III is known to this day as a ruthless king, remaining infamous for his alleged murders and nefarious acts. There are many rumors surrounding his rule, telling stories of his horrid temperament and appearance, and how he unscrupulously killed anyone who might oppose his reign. But modern historians are taking another look at his history, and some say he was not as bad as the stories claimed. Despite Richard III’s notoriety and bloody rise to power, he served as a successful king of England because of his skill in battle, unyielding determination, and political prowess.... [tags: edward IV, feudal kings]
1126 words (3.2 pages)
- Shakespeare, Loncraine, Donaldson, Richard, and Me Act 2.4 of Loncraine’s Richard III is where I started furiously scribbling notes in the margins of notes. After Rivers is shockingly murdered, Loncraine films a still shot of the countryside. A farmer leads an ox in the foreground, while a train noisily passes in the background. There is a quick cut to the train, smoke billowing from its engines, entering a dark tunnel and then another cut to a toy train in the palace. The young Yorks are playing with the toy train and also a gray airplane.... [tags: Shakespeare Loncraine Donaldson Richard Essays]
1641 words (4.7 pages)
- The Significance of Act 3 Scene 7 to Shakespeare's Richard III Richard iii essay Richard the third is the last play in a cycle of eight plays that Shakespeare wrote to dramatize the history of England between 1398-1485. The plays depict the struggle for the crown and in Richard the third it shows how Richard finally gets to the crown by committing lots of murders but then is toppled by Richmond. In this essay I will explore how significant act 3 scene 7 is to the play. In this play Richard is presented as a ingenious man who can easily manipulate others for his sake , he does this through his use of clever language, in act1 scene 2 Richard persuades Anne to marry... [tags: Papers]
901 words (2.6 pages)
- The real tragedy of Richard III lies in the progressive isolation of its protagonist. From the very opening of the play when Richard III enters "solus", the protagonist's isolation is made clear. Richard's isolation progresses as he separates himself from the other characters and breaks the natural bonds between Man and nature through his efforts to gain power. The first scene of the play begins with a soliloquy, which emphasizes Richard's physical isolation as he appears alone as he speaks to the audience.... [tags: Richard II Richard III Essays]
1206 words (3.4 pages)
- Richard III and Adolf Hitler In William Shakespeare's Richard III, we see Shakespeare's interpretation of despot rule and the parallels that stem from this interpretation. The character type of Richard has been examined and marveled for thousands of years. From Plato's examination of despot rule in the Republic, we see the motives of what drives despot rulers. A look at the background of Richard and how his upbringing and personal life contributed to his insecurities will help to understand why someone may become a despot.... [tags: Richard II Richard III Essays]
731 words (2.1 pages)
- The Evil King in Shakespeare's Richard III Richard is an actor, a fully evil actor, who through his mastery of the stage has come to appreciate his skill. Richard Moulton, in his Shakespeare as a Dramatic Thinker, proclaims Richard's wonder at his own command of the stage: "Richard has become an artist in evil: the natural emotions attending crime-whether of passionate longing, or horror and remorse-have given place to artistic appreciation of masterpieces" (40). And Robert Weimann, comparing Richard Gloucester to a character in Shakespeare's King John states: "Both characters exemplify a strenuous need to perform, 'toiling desperately' to play a role, 'to find out,' and, for better or wor... [tags: Richard II Richard III Essays]
1880 words (5.4 pages)
- Richard III: The Power of Seduction The word "seduce" according to Webster's Dictionary means to "tempt and draw away from proper conduct." This is exactly what Richard, Duke of Gloucester/King Richard III accomplishes in Richard III. In Richard's life he does not only move from deformed "hedgehog" to husband, but from "beast" to King. One may ask how such deeds were performed. However, a second look may make the deeds look simple. Richard demonstrated a strong power of seduction throughout the play that not only seduced Lady Anne, but many others.... [tags: Richard II Richard III Essays]
590 words (1.7 pages)
- Richard III and Deformity Some scholars insist that Richard was neither crippled nor humpbacked, and they are passionately dedicated to proving that Shakespeare's portrait of the inhuman monster is based on Tudor propaganda used to bolster Henry VII's weak claim to the throne The only "proof" we have of Richard III's deformity is that which is provided by Sir Thomas More in "The History of King Richard the Third". It is here that modern readers digest the adjectives which forever plague Richard "Little of stature, ill-featured of limbs, crooked-backed, his left shoulder much higher than his right".... [tags: Richard II Richard III Essays]
438 words (1.3 pages)
- Seduction in Richard III Seduction is definitely a dominant theme in Richard III. I noticed another instance of it to go along with the ones discussed in class the other night. Richard's wooing of Lady Anne is more than obvious than the example I've found; but, Act 1 scene 4 definitely contains another instance of seduction. This is Clarence's murder scene and the murderers have to convince one another to actually carry through with the act. Murderer One is the first to exhibit a hint of hesitation.... [tags: Richard II Richard III Essays]
351 words (1 pages)
- William Shakespeare's Richard III William Shakespeare’s characterization of Britain’s historical monarch Richard III, formerly Duke of Gloucester, is one of the most controversial in literature. To this day there are arguments upholding Richard III’s villainy and ascertaining his murder of the Princes in the tower, just as there are those who believe that he has been falsely represented by Shakespeare’s play and fight avidly to clear his name of any and all crimes. Because of the uncertainty surrounding his true character, Richard III is an intriguing personality to put into modern culture, which is exactly what Ian McKellen does in his rendition of the infamous ruler.... [tags: William Shakespeare Richard III Essays]
843 words (2.4 pages)
Third, the mother of the two princes, Edward IV's queen Elizabeth, took her children into sanctuary with the Church when she saw that Richard was objecting to her own family's attempt to take possession physically of the child Edward as he travelled to London to be crowned king after his father's death. Richard managed to interrupt the attempt and had the major kidnappers executed quickly. Elizabeth thus had a good reason to seek sanctuary--her family was attempting to kidnap the new and uncrowned king, and she would have looked like a traitor trying to disrupt Richard's tenure as Regent. But when the new heir was settled in London, Elizabeth then agreed to release her second son, young Richard of York, from sanctuary. This is strange behavior for a woman who fears her brother-in-law's allegedly murderous intentions towards her children. Stranger still, after the boys were declared bastards and vanish from historical records--that is, after Richard was supposed to have had them killed--Elizabeth appears with her daughters at court functions and seems to have been actively seeking husbands for them. Would a mother whose sons had been killed by the king allow her daughters to be out in public at his functions?
Fourth, we have no bodies for the princes. A pair of skeletons found in the Tower of London early in this century and once believed to belong to the Princes now seem highly unlikely, based on forensic evidence from the bones, to belong to two boys of the Princes' ages. We do, however, have records of expenditures for gear for some one called "the Bastard" dwelling in Richard's castle at York after the date when the boys vanish into the Tower of London and out of the historical records. Was this one of the Princes? Who can tell? But without bodies, we have no case against anyone for the murder.
Fifth, we are talking about a murder here, so perhaps it is time to bring British law into the picture and ask if Richard could be convicted of murder by his own country's laws. Happily, someone actually has tried this; in 1984, a trial was held for Richard and it was televised on the BBC. I'll spare you the details, but the King was acquitted. This does not mean he was innocent, so much as it means that insufficient evidence was found to convict him, beyond a reasonable doubt, of murder. That's good enough for me.
Sixth, there a number of great books out there which have sold me on Richard's innocence, and they do a far better job of arguing his innocence than I am doing here. You can find a bibliography of them at the Home Page of the Richard III Society. My particular favorites are The Last Plantagenets by Thomas Costain and The Daughter of Time by Josephine Tey, but there are many more, including a book about the 1984 trial by Mark Redhead and Richard Drewett